 |  |
|  |  |
 |
The Need for Effective Customer Complaint Handling Initiatives |
 |
 |
 |
Benefits of Effective Customer Complaint Management Initiatives
The Guide has thus far discussed what Customer Complaint Management initiatives are, the business
case for Customer Complaint Management initiatives, examples of preventive, internal complaints handling,
external private dispute resolution, and comprehensive complaints
management initiatives, and the distinctive situation of Customer Complaint Management
initiatives in the context of electronic commerce. With this background,
the Guide now examines the benefits of effective Customer Complaint Management initiatives and, in
the next section, the drawbacks of poorly designed Customer Complaint Management initiatives.
For customers, effective Customer Complaint Management initiatives offer a number of benefits.
- Preventive measures help assure customers that a company is meeting
customer service and reliability standards, and that when it does not
customers will be compensated in some way.
- Information is available up front about how a business responds to
customer problems.
- The number of problems with the products or services of a particular
merchant or group of merchants likely decreases.
- When compared with using the courts to complain, Customer Complaint Management initiatives
allow comparatively quick, fair and inexpensive solutions to
customer problems.
For businesses, Customer Complaint Management initiatives can be advantageous in a number of ways.
- They can stimulate more efficient, fair and effective operations that
minimize customer problems. This puts firms in a more favourable
light with the public, customers, government and others, and may have
the added benefit of reducing the pressure for new laws or regulations.
- Significant customer feedback can be used to devise better products
and services.
- There is a likely reduction in costly and acrimonious legal disputes.
- They complement existing laws, thereby improving relations with
government agencies and regulatory bodies.
For governments, the use of Customer Complaint Management initiatives by firms can have several
advantages.
- Public policy objectives can be furthered through non-regulatory means.
- They may complement or expand traditional regulatory regimes.
- They can go beyond the minimum standards and criteria set in law.
- The need for government intervention may be decreased.
- Standards and criteria may be set or adjusted more quickly and less
expensively than by using laws and regulations.
Drawbacks of Poorly Designed Customer Complaint Management Initiatives
While Customer Complaint Management initiatives can have significant benefits for all parties, they can
also have harmful effects when not properly developed and administered.
- They can frustrate or mislead customers. As well, Customer Complaint Management initiatives
not backed by action can have legal consequences under deceptive
advertising laws.
- When there is inadequate disclosure about the operation of a Customer Complaint Management
initiative, it can be difficult for customers, governments and businesses
to tell whether the initiative is working. It can also make it difficult for
customers to be treated fairly. For example, when customers cannot find
out about previous redress actions, it is difficult for them to decide which
redress option to use. This may bring a seemingly well-intentioned and
effective Customer Complaint Management initiative into disrepute.
- Poorly designed or implemented Customer Complaint Management initiatives bring negative publicity
and lead to loss of trust or business.
- Customer Complaint Management initiatives that attempt to restrict the ability of customers to use
other techniques (i.e. resort to the courts) or impose hidden costs on
customers are likely to provoke significant negative reaction.
- Customer Complaint Management initiatives that raise expectations but do not deliver can slow or
prevent the introduction of needed laws. In the short term, this harms
the parties or interests that should have been protected. In the long
term, it can cause customers or governments to mobilize against the
organization or sector.
- Multifirm Customer Complaint Management initiatives that restrict merchant access to the market,
decrease choice or increase price may have anti-competitive effects.
Under the provisions of the Competition Act, Customer Complaint Management initiatives may not be
used to substantially reduce competition, prevent non-participating firms
from entering the market or negatively affect customers by significantly
raising prices, reducing service or limiting product or service choice.
- Customer Complaint Management initiatives should not create barriers to interprovincial or
international trade. A Customer Complaint Management initiative that prevents firms from entering
and competing in a market may attract the attention of national or
international trade authorities.
- Customer Complaint Management initiatives can create an “uneven playing field,” since not all merchants
may choose to participate. This is not necessarily bad. A firm or
group of firms can develop a Customer Complaint Management initiative to show leadership and
gain a competitive advantage in a particular area or activity. However,
from a customer perspective, this means that there is no assurance
that all firms offer the same protections and redress services.
Customers might develop a false sense of security about products,
services or firms not actually the subject of a Customer Complaint Management initiative. As well,
firms that do conform may be penalized: they may have to bear unrecoverable
costs associated with adhering to Customer Complaint Management initiatives and could
be tainted by the non-compliance of others (so called “free riders”).
- Customer Complaint Management initiatives that are not adequately funded may frustrate both
industry and customers.
- Fees can frustrate and discourage customers from using Customer Complaint Management initiatives,
thus negatively affecting the image of the firm and decreasing
the likelihood that it will receive feedback concerning areas for
improvement.
- Disciplinary actions by Customer Complaint Management administrators that do not provide
participating firms with a real opportunity for notice and comment
prior to action may be negatively perceived and lead to legal action.
Lax or inadequate disciplinary actions can reduce credibility and fail
to stimulate appropriate corrective action.
- Customer Complaint Management initiatives on their own may be insufficient to respond to particularly
serious customer problems. For example, when a customer has
been physically harmed or has suffered large financial losses as a
result of using a product or service, going to court may be necessary.
As this list suggests, the potential drawbacks of poorly designed or
implemented Customer Complaint Management initiatives can be significant, so the decision to
develop a Customer Complaint Management initiative should not be taken lightly. It takes considerable
time, energy and resources to successfully develop and implement a Customer Complaint Management
initiative, and even then it may not achieve the hoped-for results.
Summary
Introduction
Market-based Customer Complaints Handling Initiatives
Preventive Customer Complaint Handling Initiatives
Internal Complaints Handling Initiatives
External Private Dispute Resolution Initiatives
Comprehensive Complaints Handling Systems
Characteristics of Effective Online Trustmark Programs
Online Redress
The Need for Effective Customer Complaint Handling Initiatives
Customer Complaint Handling Initiatives and the Law
Developing and Implementing Complaint Handling Initiatives
Elements of Successful Customer Complaint Handling Initiatives
Where Can I Get More Help?
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |